This book was sent to me as part of Penguin’s Blog a Classic programme.

From the back cover:
“Probably written by a student of Aristotle, The Athenian Constitution is both a history and an analysis of Athens’ political machinery between the seventh and fourth centuries BC, which stands as a model of democracy at a time when city-states operated under differing kinds of government. The writer recounts the major reforms of Solon, the rule of the tyrant Pisistratus and his sons, the emergence of the democracy in which power was shared by all free male citizens, and the leadership of Pericles and the demagogues who followed him. He goes on to examine the city’s administration in his own time — the council, the officials and judicial system. For its information on Athens’ development and how the democracy worked, The Athenian Constitution is an invaluable source of knowledge about this city-state.

P.J. Rhodes’s introduction discusses authorship and sources, and compares this work to those of Aristotle. This edition also includes notes, a chronology, a bibliography, indexes and maps.”

Other useful links:
the Wikipedia entry for Aristotle
the Wikipedia entry for The Athenian Constitution

My thoughts:
I just finished this book. It took quite a lot longer than I expected it too (probably because the notes were as long, if not longer than the original text). Rhodes did a fantastic job of analyzing, translating, and contexualizing the document.

This is what I wrote for Penguin:

I had to laugh when I received this as my selection. I’m currently in the midst of reading the entire works of Aristotle. I was kind of hoping for something completely outside of my normal fare, but I guess it’s a good thing that it was I who got this instead of someone who has no interest or background knowledge of classical Greece.

So anyway, the first thing is that this was not likely written by Aristotle himself, but rather by a student of his, perhaps as an assignment. The very good, very informative introduction by editor and translator P.J. Rhodes gives a great analysis of what led scholars to that conclusion. The intro also discusses the author’s sources, the interpolated Chapter 4, and the style of the original Greek.

Rhodes’ name doesn’t appear on the front cover but really I think it should because the book wouldn’t be half as interesting without his introduction, synopses, notes, and back matter (including sections on weights & measures, chronology, glossary, maps etc.).

He’s divided the original into sections according to periods in the history of Athens, giving each section an introduction summarizing the content and comparing it to what we know from other sources like Thucydides. Each chapter has a corresponding endnote which gives further details, evaluates the historical accuracy of the content, and, in a few instances, provides an illustration of something mentioned by the author.

I wouldn’t expect many people to run out to buy this book to read it for fun, but anyone who is reading this to gain knowledge about the history of Athens or political systems will be gratified with this edition of The Athenian Constitution. I have no way to evaluate the translation, but I expect even those who can read the original Greek would find in this Penguin a valuable resource.

Now that I’m actually finished, the only thing I really need to add is that it was very interesting to read both the historical evolution of the Athenian form of government as well as the mechanisms established to allot offices and juries. We call what we have a democracy, but compared to the democracy of ancient Athens (when they did have democracy), it doesn’t seem democratic at all (rather more like an oligarchy).

Book 30, As For Me and My House (1941) - Sinclair Ross
From the back cover:
“‘It’s an immense night out there, wheeling and windy. The lights on the street and in the houses against the black wetness, little unilluminating glints that might be painted on it. The town seems huddled together, cowering on a high tiny perch, afraid to move lest it topple into the wind.’

The town is Horizon, the setting of Sinclair Ross’ brilliant classic study of life in the Depression era. Hailed by critics as one of Canada’s great novels, As For Me and My House takes the form of a journal. The unnamed diarist, one of the most complex and arresting characters in contemporary fiction, explores the bittersweet nature of human relationships, of the unspoken bonds that tie people together, and the undercurrents of feeling that often tear them apart. Her chronicle creates an intense atmosphere, rich with observed detail and natural imagery.

As For Me and My House is a landmark work. It is essential reading for anyone who seeks to understand the scope and power of the Canadian novel.”

Other useful links:
the Wikipedia entry for Sinclair Ross
the Wikipedia entry for As For Me and My House
An essay by Paul Denham: “Narrative Technique in Sinclair Ross’s As For Me and My House”
BookCrosser cellomerl’s review of the novel

My thoughts:
I really am trying to catch up so that I’m not writing these things months after I’ve actually read them! It’s very hard to recapture one’s feelings upon finishing a book, but I’ll give it a shot.

I did enjoy this book, especially its evocation of the prairies — and the small prairie town — during the Great Depression. In fact, the landscape is the only ‘character’ of the book that is unambiguous and stark in its reality. But even in that there is a possibility that the reader is being shown a facade (just like the “false-fronted towns” Mrs Bentley refers to); after all, the town is called Horizon — a place that can never be reached no matter how far one travels. There’s just so much to think about and discuss with this novel: how reliable is Mrs Bentley’s narration? is she or is Philip the main character? what is going on in the weeks that are omitted? There’s the role that art plays in the novel, the lost son, the replacement son in Steve, and the half-son Philip at the end of the book. There’s the theme of religion and lack of religious feeling. And a lot of hypocrisy on many levels to analyse. It’s a very short book and the whole thing takes place in only about a year, but there’s so much crammed in here. An excellent book by Sinclair Ross.

From the dust jacket:
“In the 1970s in northern California, near Gold Rush country, a father and his teenage daughters, Anna and Claire, work their farm with the help of Coop, an enigmatic young man who makes his home with them. Theirs is a makeshift family, until it is riven by an incident of violence — of both hand and heart — that sets fire to the rest of their lives.

Divisadero takes us from the city of San Francisco to the raucous backrooms of Nevada’s casinos, and eventually to the landscape of south central France. It is here, outside a small rural village, that Anna becomes immersed in the life and the world of a writer from an earlier time — Lucien Segura. His compelling story, which has its beginnings at the turn of the century, circles around “the raw truth” of Anna’s own life, the one she’s left behind but can never truly leave. And as the narrative moves back and forth in time and place, we discover each of the characters managing to find some foothold in a present rough-hewn from the past.”

Other useful links:
the not-so-useful Wikipedia article on Divisadero
the Wikipedia article on Michael Ondaatje

My thoughts:
I was looking forward to reading this because it was my first Ondaatje book. I also thought the sound of the title was intriguing - a kind of combination of division and desidero (that’s “I desire” in Latin). Only later did I discover that is is the name of a street in San Francisco.

It’s been a while since I finished this book (I’m catching up, I promise!) so my memory of it is a little fragmented. In fact, this book is itself fragmented: various points of view, two completely different sets of characters, unresolved conflicts… All of which left me unsatisfied. I didn’t really connect with any of the characters of the first story, and the whole ‘professional gambler’ thing didn’t grab me. I liked the second story much better and I think I’d have liked a book just about that much much better.

I did enjoy Ondaatje’s writing though, and look forward to reading more of his books.

From the dust jacket:
“Harry Boyd, a hard-bitten refugee from failure in Toronto television, has returned to a small radio station in the Canadian North. There, in Yellowknife, in the summer of 1975, he falls in love with a voice on air, though he discovers that the real woman, Dido Paris, is even more than he imagined.

Dido and Harry are part of a cast of eccentric, utterly beguiling characters. all transplants from elsewhere, who form an unlikely group at the station. Their loves and longings, their rivalries and entanglements, the stories of their pasts and what brought each of them to the North, form the centre. Then, one summer, four of them embark on a canoe trip that takes them into the Arctic wilderness, following the route taken by the legendary Englishman John Hornby, who, along with his small party, starved to death.”

Other useful links:
the not-so-useful Wikipedia article on Late Nights on Air
the Wikipedia article on Yellowknife, NWT
the Wikipedia article on Great Slave Lake
the Wikipedia article on Elizabeth Hay
the Wikipedia article on barren-ground caribou
Elizabeth Hay’s website

My thoughts:
I met Elizabeth Hay when she did a reading from this (as yet unpublished) novel. I enjoyed it so much I bought another book of hers (as yet unread) & put Late Nights on my mental To Be Read stack. So when it won the Giller, I knew I just had to read it for real and luckily enough, received a copy for Christmas (2007).

I’ve had a fascination with the North (and what born n’ bred Canadian doesn’t?) since I read Laura Beatrice Berton’s I Married the Klondike, so I was looking forward to going back North of 60.

At first I had a difficult time sorting out who was who, with two women from outside trying to make it into radio (in fact, I actually had to start reading over again after about 30 pp). I found the backdrop of the Berger inquiry very interesting, and I loved the whole middle act of the book—the journey across the Barrens retracing John Hornby’s 1927 expedition. I didn’t really warm up to Harry, Gwen or Dido so much & I couldn’t stand Eddy. Also, the ‘epilogue’ was really, quite disappointing.